header image

New Way to Calculate Body’s “Maximum Weight Limit”

Posted by: biologystudent | October 7, 2009 | 4 Comments |



by Amy Biederman

According to Science News, there is a new way to calculate Body’s “Maximum Weight Limit”.  Most of us know the widely used BMI or Body Mass Index.  This term refers to an index that calculates a healthy body weight for a particular height.  The formula to do so is complicated because the weight in pounds needs to be multiplied by 703 and then divided by the person’s height in inches squared. Besides the formula, one can find their Body Mass Index on a BMI chart that indicates a healthy range. This index has not only proven to be complex to calculate, but also does not include weight due to muscle rather than fat. In fact, the BMI is only accurate for 90% of the population.

George Fernandez, a professor of Applied Statistics and Director of the Center for Research Design and Analysis at the University of Nevada, Reno, made it his mission to give people a simpler way of calculating a healthy weight rather than “range”. His method doesn’t require people to use charts or online calculators. In his opinion, people need a “MWL” or a “Maximum Weight Limit” so we know what weight we can’t go over. Although his method does not differ from the BMI scale, it is simpler.

For men and women, there is a baseline weight and height. For women, the baseline is 5 feet tall and a MWL of 125 lbs. For men, the baseline is 5-feet, 9-inches tall and a MWL of 175 lbs. He considers this male and female baseline the starting point of his MWL scale. From that baseline, you simply calculate how much taller/shorter you are (in inches). Then, if you are a woman, you add/subtract 4.5 lbs for each inch they differ from the baseline. Men, on the other hand, add/subtract 6 lbs for every inch they are shorter/taller than the baseline. In comparison to the widely known BMI, Fernandez’s MWL is 24.5 for women and 25.5 for men. According to the BMI, the healthy range is 18.5-25. Fernandez explains that he chose a slightly lower BMI for women and slightly higher BMI for men because typically women have less muscle mass than men. Besides being simple, the MWL can be used more universally because individuals who do not have access to technology and charts can still find their maximum weight and maintain a healthy weight lower than their calculated MWL.

It seems that both the MWL and BMI are fairly similar in their findings, however the MWL is easier for someone to calculate. I was never a fan of the BMI because I feel that is does not take muscle into consideration. As an athlete, I exercise on a regular basis and am toned, however, I am at the upper end at the “healthy range” according to the BMI. I feel that it is an inaccurate way of measuring. This is especially true for weight lifters such as my boyfriend and brothers. Both are over their “healthy range” and are considered overweight or even obese. It is ironic to find that analysis when you look at them and see what great shape they are in. However, according to this article the BMI is only accurate for 90% and individuals like myself or my brother and boyfriend may be part of the 10% where the BMI may not be truly accurate. Unlike the BMI, the MWL may be more resourceful because it gives you a maximum that partly takes muscle mass into consideration, which leads to the slight alteration from the BMI. Also, it is easier to remember one weight to stay below, and one number can lead to an easier goal or maintenance barrier.

I found this article important because the BMI is widely used weight index. However, with the MWL being a simpler method that leads to a similar finding, I thought it would be resourceful for people to know about. I know that I personally figured out my MWL in a matter of seconds!

under: Student Post

Responses - Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

I think it’s true that BMI can be a very difficult number to calculate and it makes it difficult for a person to know where they should be weight-wise. This MWL does seem like a slight improvement, but I am still skeptical that this is a better tool merely because, like you said, BMI is only accurate for 90% of the population and if Fernandez’s MWL is slightly lower or higher depending if you are male or female, how is this much different? If anything, it is making the cushion for females in particular much smaller, putting more pressure on them to be “healthy” which may actually do more damage. Our society is already crazy about the “skinny”. Should we become these people that are anal retentive about staying below their MWL and forget to live our lives simply because our biology isn’t perfect? In my opinion, MWL is BMI in disguise and it is just one more thing, telling me I’m not healthy enough.

I do agree that finding your MWL is easier than finding your BMI. I figured out my MWL quite quickly, but when I studied the BML scale I saw how it can be confusing and misleading. I agree with you Amy that both of these weigh indexes aren’t an accurate way of measuring a person’s body weight. I feel there are quite a few outside factors that play into a person’s weight that aren’t included on these indexes. You’ve mentioned that muscle mass isn’t factored in. Another thing is current health condition isn’t factored in. Each person is unique in every way and what’s a healthy weight for person #1 may not be a healthy weight for person #2. Indexes like these are what create image problems in society. People shouldn’t have to worry about what your weight is, it’s just a number. As long as they take care of themselves, eat right, and get moderate exercise than they are healthy, regardless of their number.

I would also like to say that when I state “current health condition” I mean whether someone has a health issue they are dealing with. There are many conditions that prevent people from gaining/losing weight, exercising to their potenial, or even building muscle. These conditions should not be overlooked just because they are not sociey’s norm. There are more and more people every day that discover the reason for them being over/under weight is due to an undiagnosed health issue.

So I totally calculated my MWL while reading this! Its nice to know what weight I “should” maintain. I’m assuming this weight ultimately means you are what we would to refer to as “healthy.” But also this may differ with different people; what if you had a heart condition? what if you had diabetes? Many factors play into what makes us “healthy.” When I read this article it made me think of the way our society views body weight. I believe the media is whom we have to blame for these perspectives, I too am to blame for following that perspective. Methods such as BMI and MWL are useful tools, I just hope it does not force people to become obsessive over body image, which has its own problems.

Leave a response - Create a free edublog to get your own comment avatar (and more!)

Your response:

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image

Categories